Research dossier v0.3
DWARF 3 detection research for Foo Fighter UFO events.
This is the web version of the ORBE-Net research dossier: phenotype, evidence hierarchy, Altea, official PR cases, civil candidates, historical continuity, physics, detector design, DWARF 3 station network, falsification and appendices.
Core research
Start with the actual dossier.
00Methodological ScopeThe research does not claim origin. It defines a narrow, testable Foo Fighter UFO event phenotype and turns public reports into instrument requirements.01Target PhenotypeThe target is a compact red/orange Foo Fighter-like UFO event: orb, torch, shield, plasma sphere or sensor-compact object with non-ballistic behavior.02Evidence HierarchyThe same visual object can mean different things depending on chain of custody, sensor, metadata and rejectability.
Core cases
Core cases
03Altea 2015The Altea event is the direct witness anchor: an orange/plasma object, low relative altitude, mountain background and a horizontal path toward the sea.04Official U.S. Government CasesThe modern core comes from official public releases. The government release is treated as provenance, not as a conclusion about origin.
Physical model
Physical model
09Red/Orange Emission PhysicsThe working model is not a hot solid ball. It is a dark or low-signature core surrounded by excited air, humidity, aerosols or plasma-like emission.10Lift, Translation and ControlHover requires force. If rotors, wings, balloons and jets are rejected, field-air interaction becomes the nearest public physics family to test.11Visibility ModesIf the system is an observer or vehicle, becoming red/orange may be a weakness: the air becomes the detector.
Catalog model
Catalog model
15Distribution, Migration and RecurrenceThe catalog cannot yet prove distribution or migration. The cautious model is hybrid: recurrent zones plus mobile units and visible windows.16Catalog v0.6 LogicThe internal v0.6 catalog contains more rows than the first public v0.2 layer. Not every row is evidence; many are controls.
Scientific posture
Scientific posture
17Hypotheses and FalsificationA useful theory must be easy to damage. HEDHub is built around failure modes, not belief preservation.18Research RoadmapThe next phase is not more social browsing. It is instrumentation, original files, station software and repeatable rejection.19Current ConclusionThe conclusion is not that we know what they are. The conclusion is that the target is now narrow enough to investigate.
Appendix
Appendix
AScoring RulesScoring is a way to force consistency. A high score is not proof; a strong negative flag can override visual similarity.BCore and Support Case DossiersExpanded case notes for the rows that define or support the target phenotype.COrder-of-Magnitude PhysicsThese are not proofs. They constrain simple explanations and guide experiments.DPrototype 1 ProtocolA staged laboratory protocol for controlled red/orange atmospheric emission tests.EORBE-Net Technical RequirementsSoftware requirements for the DWARF 3 station network and local detector.FManual NUFORC Review v0.6The NUFORC review keeps leads visible while separating active candidates from watchlist and rejected material.GOperational GlossaryShared vocabulary prevents the project from drifting back into vague strange-light language.